ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2025
Antimicrobial activity of copper-nickel coated door handles: a blinded, randomized controlled study in a clinical setting.
Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prevention of nosocomial infections continues to be crucial to ensure patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes. In this regard, surface contamination plays an important role in the undetected transmission of nosocomial pathogens as a continuous, sporadic event or in the context of outbreaks. However, the impact of reducing bacterial contamination through copper-coated surfaces remains controversial. Methods: A pilot study was set up in a blinded, randomized controlled design to elucidate the antimicrobial activity of door handles coated with a copper-nickel alloy. Twelve doors in a specialized department of tumor and revision surgery of a German orthopedic hospital were randomly selected to install visually indistinguishable stainless-steel door handles, either without coating (control group, n=6) or with an alloy coating consisting of 30% copper and 70% nickel (study group, n=6). Patients, all involved personnel and investigators were blinded with regard to the assignment of door handles. Door handles were sampled for viable microorganisms at 24 h after disinfection by (i) consecutive use of wet and dry swabs and (ii) contact agar slides. Bacterial growth was detected and bacteria were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. In addition, contamination kinetics of door handles were determined by ATP measurement at time points 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after disinfection. Each technique was used on three subsequent days. Results: Using swab method, the mean total number of colony forming units (cfu) of control and copper-nickel alloy surfaces was 2.14 cfu/cm Conclusion: Our data indicate a trend of reduced bacterial and overall bioburden on copper-nickel-coated door handles. Further, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate the influence of copper-coated surfaces on the prevention of hospital-acquired infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.