Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979864›Full record

ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2025

Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of a portable air cleaner using 275-nm UVC-LED radiation against airborne Coronavirus and Influenza virus.

Janina Reissner, Benjamin Reichelt, Paul Siller, Gerrid Brockmann, Martin Kriegel, Uwe Roesler, Anika Friese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janina ReissnerInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research - TZR, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin ReicheltInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research - TZR, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Paul SillerInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research - TZR, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gerrid BrockmannHermann-Rietschel-Institut, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin KriegelHermann-Rietschel-Institut, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe RoeslerInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research - TZR, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anika FrieseInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research - TZR, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the risk of airborne transmission of viruses, especially in public indoor spaces or healthcare settings. Effective indoor air purification systems are necessary to limit the spread of these pathogens, and the deployment of portable air cleaners (PACs) has increased rapidly since then. Germicidal ultraviolet (UV) radiation technologies have recently supplemented conventional air filtration technologies. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the air decontamination efficacy of a PAC using a 275-nm UVC-LED unit and fibrous-media air filters. Method: Two different filters were used in the study: a High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter and an Efficient Particulate Air (EPA) filter. The PAC was operated in an experimental aerosol chamber with an airflow rate of 200 m³/hour for 10 or 20 minutes. Subsequently, the concentration of infectious viruses and particles in the air was measured. Decontamination efficacy was compared between UVC-LED radiation, filtration, and a combination thereof against Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) and influenza A virus (H3N2) aerosols. Results: Infectious virus reductions were comparable between the UVC and filter measurements. A decrease of 94% in FCoV concentration was observed after 10 minutes of device runtime, increasing to 99.8% after 20 minutes compared to control measurements. H3N2 showed greater susceptibility, with a reduction of 99.7% achieved after 10 minutes. Interestingly, a synergistic effect was observed with significantly lower virus concentrations when both technologies were combined. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of PACs equipped with emerging UVC-LED technologies as effective tools for indoor air decontamination. The deployment of PACs equipped with UVC radiation and filtration could be a promising alternative or supplement to ventilation systems, especially in healthcare settings and other public spaces.

Indexed as

airborne virusair decontaminationCOVID-19indoor air qualityinfluenza A virusportable air cleanersUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID40979864
PMCPMC12447762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.