ReviewGMS hygiene and infection control2025
Risk of Hepatitis B transmission by healthcare workers - a systematic review.
Review in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update.Hepatology international · 2026Guideline
- [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Assessment of hepatitis B and tetanus toxoid vaccination coverage and associated factors among healthcare workers at Kabul University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals in Afghanistan.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Risk of hepatitis C transmission by healthcare workers - a systematic review.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The risk of transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) to healthcare workers (HCW) is well known. However, evidence for supporting guidelines with respect to exclusion of infected HCW from exposure prone procedures (EPP) remains poorly characterized. Method: A systematic review of studies published providing serological data for transmission of HBV infected HCW to patients was performed. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) we searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases to identify publications prior to September 2024. Results: The literature search yielded 311 studies and 39 from nine countries met the inclusion criteria. A total 53 of HCW were considered as source cases of transmission and 25,000 individuals tested for at least one HBV marker. 66 transmissions by HCW to patients were confirmed through DNA analysis; in 100 patients HBV transmissions were considered probable and in 480 patients at least possible. Of the 36 studies in which HBeAg in HCW was determined, the antigen was positive in 29 studies (80.6%), and negative only in seven studies (19.4%), comprising a total of only 31 and 17 HCW, respectively. The HBV viral load of the transmitting HCW was conducted in only 8 studies including 18 HCW, of those four were HBeAg-positive and 14 HBeAg-negative. Although the viral load in HBeAg-negative sources generally was 10 times lower than in HBeAg-positives, considerable variability was seen in HBeAg-negatives with overlapping values up to 1.5×10 Conclusions: The published literature on HBV transmission from HCW to patients is sparse and offers only limited guidance on national prevention guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.