ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Stopping versus continuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors before surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The optimal perioperative management of patients chronically using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) is still uncertain. This study aims to compare the outcomes of withholding versus continuing RASIs before surgery, focusing on efficacy and safety. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesising evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 2024. Using Stata MP v. 17, we used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes by using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Ten RCTs with 3,740 patients were included. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [Risk ratio (RR): 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84, 1.16; P = 0.88], all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.78; Conclusion: Stopping RASIs in patients undergoing surgery was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, such as MACE, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure/acute pulmonary oedema, stroke, or AKI. Conversely, discontinuing RASIs notably reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.