ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Comparison of partial pressure of oxygen between compression-only CPR and standard CPR in simulated adult cardiac arrest - A manikin-based clinical modelling.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be as effective as conventional CPR, and oxygen supplementation during compression-only CPR may be beneficial. The study aimed to compare the arterial oxygen levels achieved while supplementing oxygen through high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during compression-only CPR and bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during conventional CPR in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios on a high-fidelity simulator. Methods: The study included a simulated cardiac arrest created on a human patient simulator (HPS). The simulation included two sets of scenarios. In Simulation A, cardiac arrest was simulated on HPS, and compression-only CPR was provided by AutoPulse, and oxygen supplementation was provided using HFNC. In Simulation B, chest compression was provided by AutoPulse, and BMV was supplemented with oxygen at 15 L/min at a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2. Both simulation scenarios were evaluated for three different starting PaO Results: In Simulation A, at a starting PaO Conclusion: In a simulated setting, compression-only CPR with HFNC results in better PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.