ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Comparison of a novel anterior out-of-plane approach with standard in-plane approach in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation: A randomised controlled trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Subclavian vein cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in the operating room. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation can be done using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach. This study compares the in-plane technique with a novel anterior out-of-plane technique. The primary objective of the study was to compare the first-pass success rate between the anterior out-of-plane technique approach and the in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation. Methods: This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial included 128 patients undergoing elective surgeries that required central vein cannulation. Patients were randomised to either the anterior out-of-plane or in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided subclavian central venous access. First-pass success rates, puncture and cannulation times, needle redirections, additional punctures, and complications were recorded and compared between groups. Continuous variables were analysed using independent-sample Results: Successful cannulation was achieved in 119 patients. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher with the anterior out-of-plane approach (95%) compared to the in-plane approach (77%) ( Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation is more successful and efficient using this novel anterior out-of-plane approach compared to the standard in-plane approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.