Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979730›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2025

Lack of effect of a parent-delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial completed during COVID-19.

Kelly Burgoyne, Stephanie Hargreaves, Nasima Akhter, Helen Cramman, Paivi Eerola, Jochen Einbeck, Vic Menzies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly BurgoyneManchester Institute of Education University of Manchester Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-5154
Stephanie HargreavesManchester Institute of Education University of Manchester Manchester UK.
Nasima AkhterDepartment of Anthropology Durham University Durham UK.
Helen CrammanSchool of Education Durham University Durham UK.
Paivi EerolaSchool of Education Durham University Durham UK.
Jochen EinbeckDepartment of Mathematical Sciences Durham University Durham UK.
Vic MenziesSchool of Education Durham University Durham UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parents play a key role in their child's early development but evidence that parental engagement strategies are effective is unclear. The current study evaluated a parent-delivered early language teaching programme that aimed to support children's early language and literacy skills. Methods: A multisite, pupil-level randomised controlled trial was conducted with 450 3-4-year-old children and their families, recruited from 47 nurseries across Greater Manchester and Lancashire (UK). Families were randomly allocated to either the programme group ( Results: COVID-19 disrupted the trial, including delivery of the intervention and post-test data collection. Data from assessments completed 10-months after intervention showed no evidence that the children receiving language intervention had greater language skills than the control group. Similarly, no group differences were found on measures of the Home Learning Environment or school readiness. Conclusions: Whilst disruptions caused by COVID-19 are likely to have impacted on the findings, this study nonetheless adds to the literature which suggests that parent-delivered interventions alone may not necessarily lead to changes in home learning or to gains in children's language skills.

Indexed as

early interventioneducationhome learning environmentlanguageparentsRCT designschool readiness

Identifiers

PMID40979730
PMCPMC12446704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.