ArticleJCPP advances2025
Investigating the reasons behind a later or missed diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in young people: A population cohort study.
Article in JCPP advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transdiagnostic child mental health trajectories in Japan: protocol for a nationwide web‑based open cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Antecedents and outcomes of a later attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis in females.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026Article
- Investigating the reasons behind a later or missed diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in young people: A population cohort study.JCPP advances · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition, more often diagnosed in males. In many individuals, particularly females, ADHD is diagnosed later or missed, the reasons for this are not fully understood. Timely diagnosis is needed to provide support, management, and treatment to improve outcomes. This study aimed to understand why some young people with ADHD experience later or missed diagnosis and to consider sex differences. Methods: This study included 9991 (females = 43.69%) individuals from the Millenium Cohort Study, a UK based population study which defined recognised ADHD by a parent-reported clinician diagnosis, and unrecognised ADHD by parent-reported questionnaires. Behavioural and emotional difficulties, engagement in leisure activities, and parental characteristics, were compared between those recognised earlier (by ages 5/7, Results: Those recognised with ADHD earlier had more peer, conduct, and emotional problems, emotional dysregulation, lower cognitive ability, and poorer prosocial skills compared with those recognised later, ORs ranged from 0.27 (95% CI = 018, 0.41) to 1.20 (95% CI = 1.20, 1.32). Similar findings were seen when comparing those with recognised and unrecognised ADHD; ORs ranged from 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09, 0.15) to 1.31 (95% CI = 1.19, 1.43). Additionally, those recognised were more likely to have diagnosed autism and have less reported physical activity. Sex stratification showed that recognised males had higher emotional dysregulation than unrecognised males, but this was not seen in females. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need to consider ADHD referral, regardless of cognitive and prosocial ability or comorbidities, if children are displaying ADHD symptoms. Additionally, symptoms of ADHD not traditionally included in screening criteria, such as emotional dysregulation, should be considered to improve gender-inclusive recognition of ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.