Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979728›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2025

Social anxiety and paranoid beliefs in adolescents.

J L Kingston, B Schlier, E Leigh, D Widyasari, R P Bentall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J L KingstonRoyal Holloway University of London Egham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-8083
B SchlierUniversity of Hamburg Hamburg Germany.
E LeighDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-3770
D WidyasariUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
R P BentallUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paranoid beliefs are common in the general adolescent population. The paranoia hierarchy suggests common social evaluative concerns may develop into persecutory thoughts via ideas of reference, a milder intermediary facet of paranoia. Socially anxious concerns and paranoid beliefs co-occur in adolescent and adult groups, but the specifics of their association is not well understood. In a general population adolescent sample, we examined (a) whether social anxiety and paranoia can be differentiated, (b) patterns of co-occurrence and (c) psychosocial factors that differentiate social anxiety alone versus in combination with paranoia. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey design, recruiting UK adolescents ( Results: Measurement models supported a hierarchical structure, with separate but correlated general factors of paranoia and social anxiety. This model was invariant across age groups 14-15 and 16-17 years. The largest subgroup of participants with clinically significant symptoms showed elevated social anxiety plus paranoia (21%, Conclusions: Social anxiety and paranoia are differentiable in adolescents. Paranoia commonly co-occurs with social anxiety, especially in those with exposure to threat environments in the last 12-month. Adolescents with social anxiety plus paranoia reported the highest levels of distress, underscoring the importance of improved understanding of this group.

Indexed as

adolescentsadversitybullyingdiscriminationparanoiasocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID40979728
PMCPMC12446695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.