Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979710›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta in routine clinical practice in the Nordics and Switzerland (the NORSOS study): a prospective non-interventional study.

Anja Pinborg, Negjyp Sopa, Erling Ekerhovd, Stavros I Iliadis, June Kaspersen, Enrica Gravotta, Alexander Quaas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05499052 (Nordics and Switzerland Prospective Multicentre Non-Interventional Observational Study to Assess the Pattern of Use of REKOVELLE® in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05499052 completednot on this map

Nordics and Switzerland Prospective Multicentre Non-Interventional Observational Study to Assess the Pattern of Use of REKOVELLE® in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Procedures in Routine Clinical Practice (NORSOS)

TypeobservationalSponsorFerring PharmaceuticalsRan2022 to 2024Enrolled201ConditionsControlled Ovarian StimulationArmsREKOVELLE®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anja PinborgFertility Clinic, Department of Gynecology, Fertility and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Negjyp SopaAleris Fertility, Aleris Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erling EkerhovdFertility Department, Telemark Hospital, Porsgrunn, Norway.
Stavros I IliadisDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
June KaspersenFerring Lægemidler A/S, Kastrup, Denmark.
Enrica GravottaGlobal Research & Medical, Ferring Pharmaceutical A/S, Kastrup, Denmark.
Alexander QuaasDivision of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Follitropin delta is the first approved human recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone treatment administered through an algorithmic individualized dosing regimen based on body weight and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety profile of follitropin delta in women naïve to Study design: This prospective observational study was conducted from August 2022 to March 2024 across 14 fertility clinics in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. Consenting women with infertility (≥18 years old) receiving their first assisted reproductive technology cycle and first follitropin delta treatment were enrolled. Both fresh and frozen embryo transfers were evaluated. Follow-up continued until confirmed pregnancy outcome, early pregnancy loss, or study withdrawal. Data on follitropin delta usage, ovarian stimulation, embryo development, and safety were collected through electronic case-report forms. Patient-reported satisfaction with the follitropin delta pre-filled pen was assessed using patient questionnaires. Results: Of the 201 women enrolled, 199 completed the study. Of these, 147 (73.9%) were aged <35 years (median 32 years). The primary reason for infertility was male factor (88/199, 44.2%). Baseline characteristics included a mean body weight of 68.9 kg, and a mean AMH baseline concentration of 21.3 pmol/L, with 130/199 (65.3%) participants having AMH concentrations >15 pmol/L. Overall, 169/199 (84.9%) participants were prescribed follitropin delta according to the calculated algorithmic dose, with a mean starting dose of 10.2 µg and a mean duration of ovarian stimulation of 9.9 days. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol was used in 171/193 (88.6%) women. Almost half of the analysis population (93/194, 47.9%) achieved the algorithm-targeted response of 8-14 oocytes retrieved, and >15 oocytes were obtained in 55/194 (28.4%) women. Ongoing pregnancy rate assessed by ultrasonography 10-11 weeks after embryo transfer was 82/155 (52.9%). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (all mild cases) was reported in 8/199 (4.0%) women. Almost all women (190/193, 98.4%) expressed satisfaction with the injection pen. Conclusions: The NORSOS study (NCT05499052) provides insights into the use of follitropin delta in routine clinical practice and complements previous evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety profile.

Indexed as

Follicle Stimulating Hormone, HumanInfertility, FemaleAdultAnti-Mullerian HormoneFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesRecombinant ProteinsSwedenSwitzerlandTreatment OutcomeAnti-Mullerian HormoneFollicle Stimulating Hormone, Humanfollitropin deltaRecombinant Proteinsanti-Müllerian hormoneassisted reproductive technologyfollitropin deltain vitro fertilizationOHSSovarian stimulationpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40979710
PMCPMC12446022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.