Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979689›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025

Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology.

Ilgar I Guseinov, Arnab Bhowmik, Somaia AbuBaker, Anna E Schmaus-Klughammer, Thomas Spittler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilgar I GuseinovDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.
Arnab BhowmikDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.
Somaia AbuBakerDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.
Anna E Schmaus-KlughammerDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.
Thomas SpittlerDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored. This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount. The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.

Indexed as

5G networksDigital pathologyFrozen sectionRemote consultationSurgical pathology

Identifiers

PMID40979689
PMCPMC12446968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.