ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored. This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount. The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.