ArticleUltrasound international open2025
Analysis of correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and angiogenesis activity of renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Ultrasound international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the potential correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) with angiogenesis activity of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods: Patients with surgery resection and histopathologically proven RCC lesions were included. B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were performed one week before surgery. SonoVue was injected as the contrast agent. VueBox (Bracco, Italy) was used for the quantitative analysis. According to the histopathological and immunohistochemical results, patients were classified into two groups: active angiogenesis and inactive angiogenesis. Time intensity curves (TICs) and quantitative parameters were compared between two groups. Results: From July 2023 to November 2023, a total of 50 patients (13 females and 37 males, mean age 61.1±11.1 years) were included. The mean size of the lesions was 39.4±2.7 mm. Patients were classified into the active angiogenesis group (n=30) and the inactive angiogenesis group (n=20). On BMUS, 68.0% (34/50) of RCCs were visualized as hypoechoic lesions with ill-defined borders and irregular shapes (P>0.05). During cortical phase of CEUS, 72.6% (23/30) of RCCs with active angiogenesis were visualized with hyperenhancement (P=0.027). Only 30.0% (9/30) of RCCs with active angiogenesis showed hypo-enhancement in the parenchymal phase (P>0.05). Compared to the inactive angiogenesis group, TICs of the active angiogenesis group revealed faster and greater enhancement in the cortical phase, slower decline during the parenchymal phase, and an increased area under the curve. Among quantitative parameters, the active angiogenesis group showed the higher ratio of wash-in rate and wash-in perfusion index (P<0.05). Conclusion: DCE-US analysis has potential value in predicting angiogenesis activity in RCC lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.