ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2025
Technical and clinical validation of a novel deep learning-based white matter hyperintensity segmentation tool.
Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease-Related Depression: From Visual Scoring to Artificial Intelligence.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Incidental DWI-Positive Lesions in 2 Cohorts of CAA and CADASIL: Prevalence, Distribution, and Associations With Clinical Variables.Neurology · 2026Article
- Differential associations of plasma biomarkers with Alzheimer's disease and small vessel disease: A multimodal imaging study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Imaging markers of vascular cognitive impairment: Current advances and future directions.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2026Article
- On the origin of cerebral small vessel disease: MRI markers of cSVD in young adults with hypertension.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on MRI are a hallmark of cerebral small vessel disease. Although numerous WMH segmentation tools exist, each presents relevant limitations that can impact their usability. This research aimed to develop, validate, and disseminate a novel WMH segmentation algorithm to address these limitations. Methods: Using an intentionally heterogeneous dataset, we trained models based on the MD-GRU and nnU-Net deep learning algorithms. The new models were benchmarked in both technical and clinical validation against current state-of-the-art algorithms, utilizing datasets that were not included in the training data. For technical validation in patients, we assessed bias and precision against reference masks, scan-rescan repeatability and inter-scanner reproducibility in data from the MarkVCID consortium. Segmentation performance on 2D data was evaluated using the SWISS-AF dataset. For clinical validation, we determined percent volume change over a two-year follow-up in the DiViNAS study and calculated statistical power to detect treatment effects. Results: The newly trained algorithms outperformed the benchmarking algorithms, demonstrating better agreement with reference volumes, as well as less bias and higher precision in the repeatability and reproducibility experiments. The nnU-Net algorithm exhibited the highest statistical power for detecting treatment effects, requiring a 41 % smaller sample size than the best-performing benchmarking algorithm. Conclusion: We developed and systematically validated two novel WMH segmentation algorithms, which demonstrated excellent generalization capabilities. The comprehensive, user-friendly processing pipelines are publicly available as prebuilt software containers and can be applied to a wide range of datasets without re-training or modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.