Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979673›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2025

Technical and clinical validation of a novel deep learning-based white matter hyperintensity segmentation tool.

Benno Gesierich, Lukas Pirpamer, Dominik S Meier, Michael Amann, Minne N Cerfontaine, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Pauline Maillard, Sue Moy, Karl G Helmer, Michael Kühne and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Benno GesierichMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas PirpamerMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), Basel, Switzerland.
Dominik S MeierMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), Basel, Switzerland.
Michael AmannMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), Basel, Switzerland.
Minne N CerfontaineDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Frank-Erik de LeeuwDepartment of Neurology. Radboud Institute for Medical research and Innovation and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour. Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Pauline MaillardDepartment of Neurology, University of California Davis, Davis, USA.
Sue MoyDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Karl G HelmerDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Michael KühneUniversity Heart Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Leo H BonatiNeurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Julie W RuttenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Saskia A J Lesnik ObersteinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marco DueringMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Duygu Tosun-Turgut · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
VCID Biomarkers Coordinating CenterU24NS100591 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Steven M Greenberg · 2016 to 2026
$19.8M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS100591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on MRI are a hallmark of cerebral small vessel disease. Although numerous WMH segmentation tools exist, each presents relevant limitations that can impact their usability. This research aimed to develop, validate, and disseminate a novel WMH segmentation algorithm to address these limitations. Methods: Using an intentionally heterogeneous dataset, we trained models based on the MD-GRU and nnU-Net deep learning algorithms. The new models were benchmarked in both technical and clinical validation against current state-of-the-art algorithms, utilizing datasets that were not included in the training data. For technical validation in patients, we assessed bias and precision against reference masks, scan-rescan repeatability and inter-scanner reproducibility in data from the MarkVCID consortium. Segmentation performance on 2D data was evaluated using the SWISS-AF dataset. For clinical validation, we determined percent volume change over a two-year follow-up in the DiViNAS study and calculated statistical power to detect treatment effects. Results: The newly trained algorithms outperformed the benchmarking algorithms, demonstrating better agreement with reference volumes, as well as less bias and higher precision in the repeatability and reproducibility experiments. The nnU-Net algorithm exhibited the highest statistical power for detecting treatment effects, requiring a 41 % smaller sample size than the best-performing benchmarking algorithm. Conclusion: We developed and systematically validated two novel WMH segmentation algorithms, which demonstrated excellent generalization capabilities. The comprehensive, user-friendly processing pipelines are publicly available as prebuilt software containers and can be applied to a wide range of datasets without re-training or modifications.

Indexed as

Biomarker validationDeep learningSegmentationSmall vessel diseaseWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID40979673
PMCPMC12448020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.