ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Perceptions and moral distress in surplus embryo disposition among Japanese IVF patients: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing use of Methods: This qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with 46 female patients who had undergone IVF recruited from three Japanese fertility clinics with varying policies for embryo disposition. The interviews were conducted online between May 2024 and March 2025. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis guided by Boyatzis's inductive coding method. Results: Participants conceptualized embryos in three main ways: as "life," as genetically connected "blood ties," or as "cells or eggs." These perceptions-now more diverse than in earlier reports-influence emotional responses and dispositional decisions. Viewing embryos as life forms is often associated with guilt and sorrow, particularly in the absence of clear information or acceptable options, and could be understood as a form of moral distress from the patient's perspective. Practical considerations, such as storage fees and future family planning, also shaped both perceptions and emotional burden. Gendered responses were observed: women with female-factor infertility tended to internalize blame, while male-factor diagnoses allowed for emotional distancing. Institutional factors, including storage fees, a lack of legal frameworks, and stigma, shape moral distress and decision-making. While embryo donation for research is often preferred, donation to other patients is strongly opposed, reflecting cultural concerns about kinship and genetic identity. Support preferences range from symbolic closures to informal peer dialogues. Conclusion: Patient perceptions of surplus embryos are shaped by cultural values, gendered expectations, and institutional factors, and practical constraints. These findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, ethically grounded, and flexible care models that acknowledge moral distress as experienced by patients and the growing diversity in how embryos are conceptualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.