Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979614›Full record

ArticleAutism in adulthood2025

Guidelines for the Creation of Accessible Consent Materials and Procedures: Lessons from Research with Autistic People and People with Intellectual Disability.

Kelly B Beck, Kristen T MacKenziem, Anne V Kirby, Katherine McDonald, Ian Moura, Kaitlyn Breitenfeldt, Elizabeth Rutenberg, Tanvi Kumar, Juliet Mancino, Maya Sabatello and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism in adulthood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Review: Emotion regulation in individuals with intellectual disability - an integrative review.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Increasing participation of people with thought disorder in clinical research.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kelly B BeckDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kristen T MacKenziemUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anne V KirbyDepartment of Occupational and Recreational Therapies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Katherine McDonaldSchool of Public Health, Falk College, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Ian MouraThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Kaitlyn BreitenfeldtDepartment of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Elizabeth RutenbergDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tanvi KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Juliet MancinoHuman Research Protection Office, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maya SabatelloDivision of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Shannon RothResearch & Graduate Studies, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Christina NicolaidisSchool of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Working to increase Inclusivity in Research Ethics (WIRE) Consortium

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001856 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N, RUBIO, DORIS M · 2016 to 2025
$13.8M
Mental Health in Autistic Adults: An RDoC ApproachP50MH130957 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GREG J SIEGLE · 2022 to 2026
$13.8M
Including Adults with Intellectual Disability in Precision Medicine Research - Project ENGAGER01HD108701 · NICHD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Elizabeth McDonald, Maya Sabatello · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
Measuring Health, Function, and Social Well-being in Adults on the Autism SpectrumR01MH121407 · NIMH · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLAIDIS, CHRISTINA M · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Understanding and Supporting Reproductive Decisions among Women with Developmental Disabilities that Affect Cognition: Diversity SupplementR01HD105655 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HORNER-JOHNSON, WILLI · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Health System Integration of Tools to Improve Primary Care for Autistic AdultsR34MH111536 · NIMH · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLAIDIS, CHRISTINA M · 2017 to 2018
$690k
Participatory Research for Suicide Prevention in AutismK23MH123934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KIRBY, ANNE V · 2021 to 2024
$650k
Autism and skilled employment: An exploratory study to inform future interventionR21MH112038 · NIMH · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RAYMAKER, DORA MADELINE · 2017 to 2018
$417k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001856NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD109969NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105655NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108701NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH123934NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH130957NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121407NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112038NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH111536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informed, voluntary, ongoing consent is a central tenet of ethical research. However, consent processes are prone to exclusionary practices and inaccessibility. Consent materials are often too long and complex to foster understanding and ensure that people make truly informed decisions to participate in research. While this complexity is problematic for all people, these challenges are compounded for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Consent materials and procedures rarely incorporate accommodations for processing and communication differences common in autism and intellectual disability. Failure to provide such accommodations ultimately threatens the conduct of ethical research. We describe lessons learned across multiple major U.S. research institutions that improved informed consent materials and procedures, with the goal of fostering responsible inclusion in research for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. We used these alternative materials and procedures in multiple research projects with samples of autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Each contributing team partnered with university human research participant protections personnel, accessibility experts, community members, and researchers to develop rigorous procedures for improving the readability and accessibility of informed consent materials. We present guidelines for designing consent materials and procedures and assert that participatory methods are vital to the success of ongoing accessibility initiatives. Adoption of understandable consent materials and accessible consent procedures can cultivate more equitable, respectful, and inclusive human research practices. Future work should expand on this work to design inclusive practices for populations with additional considerations.

Indexed as

autismhuman research participant protectionsinformed consentintellectual disabilityparticipatory researchresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID40979614
PMCPMC12448064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.