Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979586›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Intercenter Variability in the Application of Biopsy-based Transcriptomics in Kidney Transplantation.

Petra Hruba, Eva Girmanova, Marek Novotny, Tomas Reischig, Igor Gala, Michaela Matyskova Kubisova, Zdenek Lys, Jakub Zieg, Zuzana Zilinska, Ivana Dedinska and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Petra HrubaTransplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva GirmanovaTransplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marek NovotnyDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas ReischigDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Igor GalaDepartment of Transplantation, Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia.
Michaela Matyskova KubisovaDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Zdenek LysDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jakub ZiegDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana ZilinskaDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantations, University Hospital Bratislava, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ivana DedinskaDepartment of Transplantation and Nephrology, University Hospital Martin and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia.
Karel Krejci3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Martina KonkolovaF.D. Roosevelt University Hospital with Policlinic Banská Bystrica, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Vladimir HanzalDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra MrazovaTransplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie CapkovaTransplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ludek VoskaDepartment of Clinical and Transplant Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KmentDepartment of Clinical and Transplant Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej ViklickyTransplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-2195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biopsy-based transcriptomics (BBT) was implemented in Central Europe in 2022 to improve kidney transplant diagnostics. Differences in diagnostic practices across transplant centers remain underexplored. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 474 kidney graft biopsies from 10 transplant centers between August 2022 and May 2024, where, besides routine histology, BBT using the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) was performed. Differences in BBT indications and discrepancies between histology assessment by Banff 2022 and MMDx sign-outs among transplant centers were evaluated. Results: Most centers used BBT in only 12%-31% of all performed biopsies, relying on histology alone for most diagnostic decisions. BBT indications varied across centers: 3 focused on histological no-rejection with clinical discrepancy (44%, 45%, and 70%), 2 on chronic or chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR; clinical discrepancy 44% and 48%), and 2 on borderline changes (clinical discrepancy 30% and 33%). BBT showed moderate agreement with histology (κ = 0.49), with similar discrepancy rates between high- and low-volume centers. Molecular AMR was found in 44% of probable AMR, 63% of active AMR, 63% of microvascular inflammation, C4d Conclusions: A moderate discrepancy between histology and MMDx sign-outs was found regardless of the center volume. BBT indications notably varied among centers. Standardized indications should be defined to improve the integration of molecular diagnostics into routine care.

Identifiers

PMID40979586
PMCPMC12448155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.