ReviewBJUI compass2025
Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer.
Review in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive biochemical insights into derivatives of PSA and glycosylation-specific changes in PSA: role in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
- Beyond Total PSA: Clinical Significance of S2,3PSA% in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Review
- Epigenetic and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Bridging Tumor Heterogeneity and Clinical Implementation.Cancers · 2026Review
- Investigating key genes and molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer and coronary heart disease through transcriptomics and experimental validation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men globally, with a rising incidence. Early detection through population-based screening by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing improves survival outcomes, at the expense of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant disease. Here, we explore emerging tools for more effective PCa early detection and evaluate their potential roles for PCa screening. Materials and Methods: Key articles on emerging adjuncts and alternatives to PSA for PCa early detection were identified. Results: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) remains the gold standard modality for identifying clinically significant PCa and has been evaluated for screening. Newer imaging strategies incorporating biparametric MRI (bpMRI) or multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) potentially offer similar accuracy to mpMRI. Saliva-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold potential as a non-invasive screening tool to identify at-risk patient groups. Blood-based biomarker tests can improve risk stratification, reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining detection of clinically significant cancers compared to PSA alone. Urine-based biomarker tests have been examined for the early detection and risk stratification of clinically significant disease as adjuncts to PSA testing. Conclusion: PSA is commonly used to detect early PCa, but its lack of specificity and associated overdiagnosis risk has led to controversy over its use for population-based screening. Imaging modalities such as mpMRI have reduced detection of clinically insignificant PCa, and emerging cost-effective alternatives, such as bpMRI and mpUS, show promise. Molecular biomarkers and PRS for risk stratification may help target imaging-based early detection more effectively to at-risk populations. Prospective randomised clinical trials are urgently needed to evaluate the performance of different modalities for population-wide screening. Future developments may involve technologies such as artificial intelligence and diagnostic tests that incorporate circulating tumour markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.