Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979549›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2025

Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Muhammad Haider, Jeffrey J Leow, Tobias Nordström, Ashkan Mortezavi, Peter Albers, Rakesh Heer, Prabhakar Rajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond Total PSA: Clinical Significance of S2,3PSA% in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad HaiderCentre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-0555
Jeffrey J LeowDepartment of Urology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Tobias NordströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Sjukhus Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-7546
Ashkan MortezaviDepartment of Urology University Hospital Zürich Zürich Switzerland.
Peter AlbersDepartment of Urology University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany.
Rakesh HeerDivision of Surgery, Imperial College Imperial Prostate London UK.
Prabhakar RajanCentre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-9878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men globally, with a rising incidence. Early detection through population-based screening by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing improves survival outcomes, at the expense of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant disease. Here, we explore emerging tools for more effective PCa early detection and evaluate their potential roles for PCa screening. Materials and Methods: Key articles on emerging adjuncts and alternatives to PSA for PCa early detection were identified. Results: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) remains the gold standard modality for identifying clinically significant PCa and has been evaluated for screening. Newer imaging strategies incorporating biparametric MRI (bpMRI) or multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) potentially offer similar accuracy to mpMRI. Saliva-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold potential as a non-invasive screening tool to identify at-risk patient groups. Blood-based biomarker tests can improve risk stratification, reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining detection of clinically significant cancers compared to PSA alone. Urine-based biomarker tests have been examined for the early detection and risk stratification of clinically significant disease as adjuncts to PSA testing. Conclusion: PSA is commonly used to detect early PCa, but its lack of specificity and associated overdiagnosis risk has led to controversy over its use for population-based screening. Imaging modalities such as mpMRI have reduced detection of clinically insignificant PCa, and emerging cost-effective alternatives, such as bpMRI and mpUS, show promise. Molecular biomarkers and PRS for risk stratification may help target imaging-based early detection more effectively to at-risk populations. Prospective randomised clinical trials are urgently needed to evaluate the performance of different modalities for population-wide screening. Future developments may involve technologies such as artificial intelligence and diagnostic tests that incorporate circulating tumour markers.

Indexed as

4 K scoreAIearly diagnosisExoDx prostateMRIMyProstateScorepolygenic risk scoreprostate cancerprostate health indexPRSPSAscreeningSelectMDxStockholm 3ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40979549
PMCPMC12446083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.