Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979517›Full record

ArticleBMJ innovations2022

Real-time continuous measurement of lactate through a minimally invasive microneedle patch: a phase I clinical study.

Damien K Ming, Saylee Jangam, Sally An Gowers, Richard Wilson, David Me Freeman, Martyn G Boutelle, Anthony Eg Cass, Danny O'Hare, Alison H Holmes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ innovations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04238611 (Minimally-Invasive Realtime Assessment of Continuous Lactate in Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04238611 naunknown statusnot on this map

Minimally-Invasive Realtime Assessment of Continuous Lactate in Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2021 to 2022Enrolled15ConditionsExercise, LactateArmsMicroneedle, Blood lactate measurement, Exercise regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Damien K MingCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3125-6378
Saylee JangamDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9295-6904
Sally An GowersDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard WilsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David Me FreemanDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martyn G BoutelleDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony Eg CassDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Danny O'HareDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 215010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Determination of blood lactate levels supports decision-making in a range of medical conditions. Invasive blood-sampling and laboratory access are often required, and measurements provide a static profile at each instance. We conducted a phase I clinical study validating performance of a microneedle patch for minimally invasive, continuous lactate measurement in healthy volunteers. Methods: Five healthy adult participants wore a solid microneedle biosensor patch on their forearms and undertook aerobic exercise for 30 min. The microneedle biosensor quantifies lactate concentrations in interstitial fluid within the dermis continuously and in real-time. Outputs were captured as sensor current and compared with lactate concentrations from venous blood and microdialysis. Results: The biosensor was well-tolerated. Participants generated a median peak venous lactate of 9.25 mmol/L (IQR 6.73-10.71).Microdialysate concentrations of lactate closely correlated with blood. Microneedle biosensor current followed venous lactate concentrations and dynamics, with good agreement seen in all participants. There was an estimated lag-time of 5 min (IQR -4 to 11 min) between microneedle and blood lactate measurements. Conclusion: This study provides first-in-human data on use of a minimally invasive microneedle patch for continuous lactate measurement, providing dynamic monitoring. This low-cost platform offers distinct advantages to frequent blood sampling in a wide range of clinical settings, especially where access to laboratory services is limited or blood sampling is infeasible. Implementation of this technology in healthcare settings could support personalised decision-making in a variety of hospital and community settings. Trial registration number: NCT04238611.

Identifiers

PMID40979517
PMCPMC7618145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.