ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Comparison of Stepwise Lung Recruitment with Conventional Technique on Lung Function During One-Lung Ventilation in Infants Undergoing Segmental Lung Resection.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thoracoscopic segmental lung resection utilizes one-lung ventilation (OLV) to isolate and safeguard the lung while enhancing surgical field visibility. This study aimed to assess the protective influence of stepwise lung recruitment maneuvers on lung function in infants undergoing OLV during thoracoscopic segmental lung resection. Methods: A total of 78 pediatric patients who were slated for elective general anesthesia and segmental lung resection via thoracoscopy were randomly allocated to either the stepwise lung recruitment group (SR group) or the controlled lung expansion group (CR group). The study meticulously documented several key variables, including duration of one-lung ventilation, duration of surgical procedure, amount of blood loss, and volume of intraoperative fluid replacement. Results: The following did not exhibit any statistically significant differences between the two groups: anesthesia time, surgery time, one-lung ventilation time, and fluid replacement volume ( Conclusion: Stepwise lung recruitment confers protective benefits on lung function in pediatric patients and concurrently diminishes the incidence of pulmonary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.