ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Estimating the Prevalence and Severity of Isolated Small-Angle Strabismic Amblyopia.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Isolated small-angle (< 20PD) strabismic amblyopia (is-asa) is not obvious to parents and pediatricians and can be missed by current photoscreeners. To improve early screening methods, the previously unknown prevalence and severity of is-asa is estimated from a twenty-year prospective observation. Methods: Published population data from the Multi-Ethnic and Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Studies (MEPEDS and BPEDS) were combined to estimate the cumulative prevalence. Then prospective, consecutive digital images of Brückner Test from 2003 to 2025 by one pediatric ophthalmologist were obtained with confirmatory exams. These were then compared to Alaska population and vision screening data. Results: From MEPEDS and BPEDS community screening data, patients with all strabismus, constant strabismus and strabismic amblyopia were stratified by strabismus angle suggesting that isolated small-angle strabismus (is-as) may occur in 1/200 children while is-asa may be 1/400 children. Over 22 years, 34 Alaska Brückner patients had isolated, constant strabismus less than 20 prism diopters of which 9 presented with amblyopia of which 4 had post-treatment residual amblyopia worse than 20/40. Considering population, doctors and referral rates, the Alaska prevalence of is-as is about 1 in 700 (0.03-0.24%) children while is-asa is about 1 in 7000 (0.006-0.024%) children. Conclusion: From two imperfect sources; review of large community screening studies and from prospective Brückner Test analysis, the prevalence of isolated small-angle strabismic amblyopia is so rare that future screening methods would require very high specificity. The Rebion blinq and 2WIN CR-function can identify is-asa in older children. Current photorefraction methods with early specific instrument referral criteria followed by sensitive acuity screening are still effective since is-asa is so rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.