ArticleACS environmental Au2025
Influence of Temperature, Humidity, Personal Hygiene, and Clothing on the Ozonolysis of Skin Oil at the Skin's Surface: Self Regulation.
Article in ACS environmental Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydroxyl radical as an indoor oxidant.Environmental science: atmospheres · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactions between skin oil and ozone are a substantial source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from the human body, yet factors influencing these reactions and emissions have only recently begun to be investigated. In this study, we conducted single-person chamber experiments involving three volunteers to systematically assess the influence of various factors, including temperature, relative humidity (RH), personal hygiene (bathing frequency and clothing soiling), and clothing coverage. We found that chamber air temperature and RH, within the range of 22-31 °C and 40-70% respectively, had negligible effects on ozone-driven VOC emissions, likely due to the body's regulation of its surface temperature and humidity. This finding contrasts with the pronounced RH dependence reported for ozone reaction with skin oil constituents or skin-oil-soiled materials in the absence of such surface regulation. Refraining from changing clothes for 3 days increased the total emissions of key products by ∼25%, while refraining from showering for 3 days showed minimal effect, likely because skin oil on body surfaces rapidly re-equilibrates. In addition, compared with wearing freshly laundered t-shirts and shorts, wearing clothing that covered more of the body decreased the summed surface yield by nearly 50%. These findings provide new insights into skin oil chemistry adjacent to the body, highlighting the body's role in regulating the surface environment where exogenous chemistry occurs. The results suggest that a simple model that does not account for variations in bathing frequency, indoor air temperature, and humidity, might be sufficient to describe ozone-dependent dermal emission of VOCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.