ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2025
A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Education in Saudi Arabia: Outcomes, Barriers, and Implementation Challenges.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Common learning activities, teaching strategies, and facilitation practices in interprofessional education-a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) is an important concept in healthcare education. Evaluating IPE implementation is essential for identifying challenges, exploring opportunities, and strengthening integration. This study evaluated the available evidence on IPE in Saudi Arabia, focusing on its outcomes, barriers, and A scoping review methodology was employed to analyse research from four databases covering the period from 2000 to 2024. The search used keywords such as "IPE" and "Saudi Arabia" and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. In total, 5,174 records were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for relevance, 21 articles were included in the final review. Most studies followed a cross-sectional design, used the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS), and were conducted in Central Saudi Arabia. This review highlights the growing evidence for the implementation of IPE in Saudi Arabia. Although the findings indicate a positive attitude towards IPE, challenges remain in the implications for the educational system. Addressing this gap and ensuring a more structured and widespread implementation can enhance IPE and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.