Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2024

The safety and efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water solution for wound irrigation: post-market clinical follow-up study.

Veronika Valdová, Vladimíra Štěpánová, Lenka Lapčíková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronika ValdováIndependent Consultant, Prague, Czechia.
Vladimíra ŠtěpánováNewWaterMeaning, s.r.o., Prague, Czechia.
Lenka LapčíkováNewWaterMeaning, s.r.o., Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic wounds are a significant public health challenge, representing a considerable burden on the healthcare system. There are numerous gaps in knowledge in the treatment of chronic wounds. First, it is difficult to follow patients through different types of care. Wounds in polymorbid, elderly patients often remain unhealed due to the patient succumbing to their primary disease. No reliable data exist regarding the time to wound closure, type of interventions, the use of antibiotics, the nature and rate of complications, or the causes of treatment failures. Methods: This Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) study is a prospective, multicentric, observational, descriptive, qualitative survey among healthcare professionals that involves 237 patients with acute and chronic wounds treated with superoxide-based wound irrigation solution DebriEcaSan Alfa in real-world settings over 12 weeks, both outpatient and inpatient. The study aimed to collect additional clinical data to confirm the safety, performance, and clinical benefit of DebriEcaSan Alfa. Results: The Manufacturer collected 237 survey forms from 81 healthcare facilities, nursing homes, and outpatient clinics in the Czech Republic. The most common diagnoses were venous leg ulcer, pressure ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, and traumatic wound. The most common comorbidities and risk factors were obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral artery disease. Significant improvement was observed in all parameters, including pain, malodor, affected tissues, reduction in wound size, and granulation and epithelization. A marked reduction in size was observed in all wound size categories. 19 (8%) patients healed by end of week 6; and 66 (28%) healed by week 9. 130 (55%) patients were considered healed by week 12. Discussion: The current clinical practice guidelines refrain from recommending any of the available irrigation solutions and wound dressings due to low-quality evidence. Superoxidized solutions have excellent biocompatibility and are non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, not irritating, non-genotoxic, and have broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. There is no objective baseline to compare the results to, as typical healing times in a comparable population are not accessible. No single standard of care exists in the treatment of chronic wounds, and significant variability in practices exists across the health system.

Indexed as

chronic wounddiabetic foothypochlorous acidneutral electrolyzed waterpressure ulcersuperoxidized solutionvenous leg ulcerwound irrigation

Identifiers

PMID40979392
PMCPMC12443096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.