ReviewFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2024
Integrating electronic health records with other data sources for postmarket drug safety signal identification: a review.
Review in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of a pharmacovigilance screening heuristic with expert clinical consensus for adverse drug reaction signal classification at a Pakistani tertiary care hospital.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance in Cell and Gene Therapy: Evolving Challenges in Risk Management and Long-Term Follow-Up.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Global patterns and trends in spontaneous reporting systems: VigiBase, FAERS, VAERS, and JADER.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Article
- Article
- Suicidality Risks Associated with Finasteride, a 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor: An Evaluation of Real-World Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reports.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacovigilance and bioethics: the importance of a neglected relationship.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2025Review
- Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures into routine paediatric pharmacovigilance: opportunities for safety monitoring with practical use scenarios from paediatric oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have emerged as resources for both the identification of adverse drug events (ADEs) and general population health surveillance, however questions remain around how best to utilize EHR data for drug safety signal identification. While the majority of signal identification research has utilized spontaneous reports and health insurance claims, these data also have limitations. Pharmacovigilance approaches combining EHR data with other data sources have the potential to address many of the shortcomings of individual sources. This mini-review seeks to provide an overview of some of the recent research leveraging EHR data in combination with spontaneous reports, claims data, and other pharmacovigilance data sources for drug safety signal identification. Studies have shown that combining EHR data with these and other sources is often beneficial compared to the use of a single source alone, however the synergism or friction introduced is insufficiently explored in current literature. Our review explores how EHR data benefits signal identification when used in combination with other sources, what methods have been applied, and what considerations have previously been noted. Finally, we identify gaps in current research and highlight important considerations for future work using multiple real world data sources for drug safety surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.