ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: The safety of SREC was assessed through a series of tests, including acute oral toxicity in mice and rats, a 90-day subchronic toxicity test in rats, genotoxicity assays (Ames test, mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, and mouse sperm abnormality test), and teratogenicity evaluation in pregnant rats. Results: The acute oral toxicity test indicated that the LD₅₀ of SREC in mice and rats was greater than 5,000 mg/kg body weight. In the 90-day subchronic toxicity test, SREC was non-toxic at doses up to 50,000 mg/kg in feed. The Ames test showed no mutagenic effects on Discussion: SREC exhibited low toxicity in both acute and subchronic tests, and no evidence of genotoxicity or teratogenicity was observed. These findings suggest that SREC is safe as a potential feed additive and provide valuable reference data for its safety evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.