Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979328›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025

Determinants of interprofessional collaboration in surgery: A scoping review.

Else Agustina, Respati Suryanto Dradjat, Viera Wardhani, Kuswantoro Rusca Putra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Else AgustinaDoctoral Program in Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Respati Suryanto DradjatDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Viera WardhaniPostgraduate Program in Hospital Management, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Kuswantoro Rusca PutraDepartment of Nursing Management, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing interprofessional collaboration practices is a key strategy for enhancing the quality and outcomes of health services. This collaboration involves multiple professions, requiring cooperation from each team member and organization to improve patient satisfaction and safety. This study aims to examine the determinant factors and their relationships in interprofessional collaboration practices within the scope of surgical procedures. This study employs a scoping review approach, following the stages of problem identification, literature collection, literature selection, thematic analysis, mapping, and report preparation. The analysis identified 11 articles that met the criteria and revealed determinant factors at three levels: individual, team, and organizational. These determinant factor groups consist of several factors; at the individual level, work experience and age factors were predominant; at the team level, communication and teamwork were key factors; and at the organizational level, the factors included organizational characteristics and hospital design programs. The analysis indicated that certain determinant factors influence interprofessional collaboration (IPC) practices both directly and indirectly through intermediary determinants that link the influence of primary determinant factors to collaborative practices in the surgical field. Future research should conduct in-depth analyses of these determinant factors within the surgical field or in other health service areas.

Indexed as

Collaborationhealth servicesinterprofessionalinterprofessional collaborationsurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID40979328
PMCPMC12448520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.