ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Satisfaction of nursing students on online curriculum delivery.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional face-to-face teaching is considered as a customary model of learning in nursing since a long time. However, the integration of online learning platforms in nursing education has increased in the last few years. It is crucial to know the students' readiness and willingness to learn in this novel milieu in order to facilitate an effectual and significant learning atmosphere. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed to assess the satisfaction levels of nursing students regarding online curriculum delivery. Convenience sampling technique was used to recruit the nursing students from nursing colleges in North India. Data were collected from 103 nursing students through student satisfaction scale. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis.
resultsThe majority of students reported moderate satisfaction (76.7%) with online learning. Areas of satisfaction included flexibility in achieving course outcomes (53.40%), location flexibility (59.2%), time-saving (59.2%), instructor effectiveness in terms of explaining concepts (54.3%), friendliness with technology (64.08%), regularity in lectures (70.87%). However, challenges were also identified. These included a lack of student interaction (62.1%), student isolation (61.1%), technical difficulties (74.7%), cost of devices (65.05%) and internet cost (61.1%), and limitations in delivering practical skills (64.08%).
conclusionWhile students appreciate flexibility and convenience, challenges exist. Educators should consider these findings to create more engaging and effective online learning environments that address the unique needs of nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.