ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Design, implementation, and comprehensive evaluation of the specialized teachings of health information technology students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing need for a comprehensive assessment method to assess the various essential skills of Health Information Technology (HIT) students. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a holistic assessment method for HIT students. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was carried out in three phases. During the design phase, the expected competencies for professional roles were identified through the brainstorming sessions. In the implementation phase, the appropriate assessment method [project-based, objective structured practical evaluation (OSPE), multiple choice questions (MCQs), and real environment observation] was considered for each competency. In the assessment phase, the opinions of the stakeholders regarding the four-stage assessment were evaluated.
resultsThirteen competencies of HIT graduates and their assessment methods were identified in three main areas: health information management, IT, and research. Students' competencies were then assessed in two consecutive years (2022 and 2023). In the second period, students' scores increased in competencies assessed as project-based, OSPE, and observation in the real environment and decreased in MCQs. The students' views on the new comprehensive assessment method were also investigated based on four criteria. The mean scores for satisfaction, usefulness, and motivation increased among the students of the second course, while the mean score for stressors decreased.
conclusionDespite the amount of time and energy that has gone for this method, the cost-effectiveness of the method has been recognized by the process designers. By repeating this method over the next years, students' adherence to this style will increase and, in addition to reducing stress, they will improve their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.