ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Lip Enhancement and Perioral Area Correction With New Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Prospective Safety Study.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) is the gold standard for the aesthetic treatment of facial volume and wrinkles. Objectives: The authors of this study aim to evaluate the safety and performance of 2 new HA fillers for the treatment of the lips and perioral area. Methods: This multicenter prospective study enrolled 72 patients. All patients received lip enhancement with ESTYME LIPS (EST Results: After 30 days, at least 1 ISR was observed in 35% of the participants on the lips, 2% on the fine lines, and 2% on the NLF. At 12 months, an improvement of at least 1 point was still observed in 66% of participants on the lips, 74% on the fine lines, and 54% on the NLFs. Throughout the study, lip functionality was not affected by their treatment and both assessors and patients rated overall aesthetic improvement and good satisfaction. Conclusions: In this limited cohort, EST Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.