ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2025
Take Caution of Normal Visual Acuity in Posterior Cortical Atrophy!
Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher-order visual symptoms of patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) are not well recognized in routine ophthalmological examination. More specifically, vision as assessed by the Snellen or Monoyer chart may not be sensitive enough. We hypothesized increased visual difficulties related to 1) visual crowding and to 2) short distances/larger stimuli. We therefore aimed at comparing 1) far visual acuity measures using the Monoyer (each line is presented separately) and the ETDRS charts (all lines are presented at the same time), as well as 2) far and closer visual acuity using the ETDRS chart (at 4 and at 2 meters). These tests were performed in a group of patients with PCA (PCA-AD) and a group of typical amnesic form (T-AD as a control group) of Alzheimer disease (AD) without any ophthalmologic pathology. While the Monoyer chart did not allow to distinguish between the two groups, the PCA-AD group specifically displayed a decrease of visual acuity when the ETDRS chart, rather than the Monoyer chart, was tested at 4 meters (effect of visual crowding), and another decrease when the ETDRS chart was tested at 2 meters, rather than at 4 meters (effect of stimulus size/distance). This uncommon decrease of visual acuity with closer distance correlated with a score of higher-order visual symptoms (Q-ACP). The present study incites ophthalmologists to pay attention to the possible discrepancy between different conditions of visual acuity assessment and preconizes to combine these conditions for a better evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.