ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
The risk of hospitalization associated with foehn winds and temperature in the mountainous region of Switzerland.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foehn wind as a biometeorological stressor: effects on somatic and mental health - a narrative review.International journal of biometeorology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foehn winds are intense warm winds, common in mountain regions, but their health impacts and potential to exacerbate existing heat-related risks remain poorly understood. This is particularly concerning for rural areas where older, heat-vulnerable individuals live. Objective: We investigated the independent and combined association of foehn winds and temperature with cause-specific emergency hospitalizations in Switzerland. Methods: We analyzed daily temperature, foehn winds intensity, and cause-specific hospitalizations near eight foehn wind-observing meteorological stations in Switzerland (1998-2019). We performed a case-time series analysis to examine the association between foehn winds intensity and hospitalization risk with and without temperature adjustment, and whether foehn winds amplify cold and heat-related hospitalizations with an interaction term between foehn winds and temperature. Results: Foehn winds intensity showed small and no consistent association with hospitalizations in temperature-adjusted (0.4% [95% confidence interval: -1.1%, 1.8%] per 6 hours increase in daily full foehn winds intensity) and nonadjusted models (0.8% [-0.5%, 2.3%]). However, foehn winds may amplify heat-related hospitalization risk with a 14% (-3%, 33%) increase in risk at the 99th temperature percentile (vs. temperature of minimum risk) on foehn days, compared with -2% (-8%, 6%) on non-foehn days. The association was larger for females, older adults, and for hospitalizations due to respiratory and mental health causes. Conclusions: While foehn winds did not directly impact hospitalizations, they may contribute to an amplification of heat-related health risks, especially for females and older adults. Further research is needed to assess their effects in other regions, climates, and vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.