ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Progress in genetic mechanisms and precise treatment of neurocutaneous syndrome-related epilepsy.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical characteristics of six cases of neurofibromatosis type 1-associated infantile epileptic spasms syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Epilepsy, Cognitive, and Behavioral Outcomes in Neurocutaneous Syndromes: A Comparative Review of NF1, TSC, and Sturge-Weber Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring global access to healthcare and utilisation for neurocutaneous syndromes: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurocutaneous syndromes are a group of genetic disorders involving the nervous and cutaneous systems, including Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS), and others. The incidence of epilepsy, a core clinical manifestation, is significantly higher than in the general population. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an updated overview of the genetic mechanisms and recent advances in precise treatment for neurocutaneous syndrome-related epilepsy. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases using all MeSH terms related to 'Neurocutaneous Syndromes', 'Epilepsy/genetics', 'Signal Transduction', and 'Precision Medicine'. Selected papers underwent review and risk of bias (RoB) assessment to evaluate core questions. Somatic or germline mutations dysregulate key signaling pathways (e.g., mTOR, Ras-MAPK, PI3K-AKT), inducing malformations of cortical development (MCD) and neuronal-glial dysfunction that collectively form epileptogenic networks. This constitutes the primary pathogenic mechanism underlying neurocutaneous syndrome-related epilepsy. Precise treatment strategies based on molecular mechanisms have achieved breakthroughs: mTOR inhibitors significantly reduce seizure frequency in TSC patients, and cannabidiol (CBD) demonstrates broad-spectrum antiepileptic efficacy in TSC and Dravet syndrome. Advances in surgical techniques, such as multimodal imaging-guided resection, improve outcomes in refractory epilepsy. However, clinical translation faces challenges including technical limitations in detecting mosaic mutations, insufficient specificity of targeted drugs, and interdisciplinary collaboration gaps. Future directions require integrating multi-omics technologies, developing novel gene therapies (e.g., CRISPR-based approaches), and establishing multicenter databases linking genotype-phenotype-treatment responses to advance personalized precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.