ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
The adamant adherence to a prior belief: the case of anosognosia in anorexia nervosa.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a complex psychiatric disorder marked by restrictive eating and distorted body image. Often, individuals with AN show a persistent denial of illness severity, even in the presence of their pathology's life-threatening consequences. This condition, known as anosognosia, has been extensively investigated in right-brain damaged patients who deny their contralesional motor deficit (anosognosia for hemiplegia; AHP). In the present perspective, we draw parallels with AHP in the attempt to explain anosognosia for the illness in AN through the most recent theoretical computational accounts. We review evidence suggesting that anosognosia in AN may be rooted in unbalanced prediction error and suboptimal multisensory integration mechanisms. Specifically, individuals with AN would normally rely more heavily on exteroceptive information at the expense of signals coming from the inside of the body-i.e., interoception-, in addition to which a distorted body memory overrides new incoming sensory information, leading to inadequate updated body image. These disrupted processes potentially involve dysfunctional insular, striatal, and prefrontal regions, whereby alterations in the dopaminergic reward system may reinforce maladaptive behaviors and attenuate responses to updating feedback. We propose a neurocognitive model according to which individuals with AN would rely excessively on outdated third-person body representations, failing to integrate new egocentric sensory cues. This perspective may offer ideas for future applications in cognitive rehabilitation of AN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.