Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979198›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

The adamant adherence to a prior belief: the case of anosognosia in anorexia nervosa.

Stelina Rushani, Gerardo Salvato, Manuela Sellitto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stelina RushaniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Gerardo SalvatoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Manuela SellittoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a complex psychiatric disorder marked by restrictive eating and distorted body image. Often, individuals with AN show a persistent denial of illness severity, even in the presence of their pathology's life-threatening consequences. This condition, known as anosognosia, has been extensively investigated in right-brain damaged patients who deny their contralesional motor deficit (anosognosia for hemiplegia; AHP). In the present perspective, we draw parallels with AHP in the attempt to explain anosognosia for the illness in AN through the most recent theoretical computational accounts. We review evidence suggesting that anosognosia in AN may be rooted in unbalanced prediction error and suboptimal multisensory integration mechanisms. Specifically, individuals with AN would normally rely more heavily on exteroceptive information at the expense of signals coming from the inside of the body-i.e., interoception-, in addition to which a distorted body memory overrides new incoming sensory information, leading to inadequate updated body image. These disrupted processes potentially involve dysfunctional insular, striatal, and prefrontal regions, whereby alterations in the dopaminergic reward system may reinforce maladaptive behaviors and attenuate responses to updating feedback. We propose a neurocognitive model according to which individuals with AN would rely excessively on outdated third-person body representations, failing to integrate new egocentric sensory cues. This perspective may offer ideas for future applications in cognitive rehabilitation of AN.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosaanosognosiabody imagedopaminergic reward systeminsulainteroceptionmultisensory integrationprediction error

Identifiers

PMID40979198
PMCPMC12447322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.