ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Unilateral biportal endoscopy for minimally invasive spinal fusion: Advancements in biomaterials and clinical outcome optimization.
Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar interbody fusion is essential for treating degenerative lumbar diseases. The disadvantages of open surgery have led to the evolution of minimally invasive spine surgery, including endoscopic techniques such as unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). Leveraging arthroscopic principles, UBE offers superior visualization and flexibility and expands from decompression to fusion (UBE fusion). However, achieving robust UBE fusion presents challenges, such as suboptimal arthrodesis rates and implant-related complications, requiring more than surgical skill alone. Optimizing UBE fusion critically depends on the effective integration of advanced biomaterials with the surgical technique. This minireview assessed recent advances in UBE, focusing on the development of novel biomaterials, such as functionalized porous, expandable, or double-cage designs, to improve bone regeneration outcomes. These advancements address challenges, like washout of bone graft material and biologics, and utilize growth factors, such as recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins, while exploring pathway modulation to improve outcomes. We also evaluated clinical optimization strategies involving technical refinements, fluid and hemostasis control, key complication mitigation especially concerning dural tears and hematomas, and technologies such as navigation and robotics. While UBE shows promise particularly for early recovery, its long-term success hinges on these biotechnological advancements. High-quality evidence, especially from randomized controlled trials and long-term studies, is needed to validate integrated strategies and define the optimal role of UBE fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.