Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979147›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025

Animal models for study on rotator cuff healing.

Qi-Long Jiang

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Qi-Long JiangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chongqing Orthopedic Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing 400043, China. jys19870607@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are highly prevalent, and there is an urgent need to understand their healing mechanisms to improve treatment outcomes for patients. This editorial aims to summarize the roles and limitations of common animal models (including rodents, rabbits, sheep, dogs, and primates) and second-look arthroscopy in rotator cuff healing research. Different animal models offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. For example, rodent models are cost-effective and suitable for genetic studies but have anatomical differences from humans. Rabbit models are favored for their relatively large tendon size and ease of surgical manipulation, yet they still deviate from human shoulder anatomy in some aspects. Larger animals like sheep and dogs have more similar shoulder structures to humans but come with high costs and challenges in maintaining consistent experimental conditions. Second-look arthroscopic studies have provided evidence for the effectiveness of current surgical techniques. Animal models will continue to play a crucial role in further exploring the local microenvironment of the rotator cuff, which is expected to help develop more effective strategies to promote healing.

Indexed as

Animal modelArthroscopic repairRotator cuffSecond-look arthroscopyTendon-bone healing

Identifiers

PMID40979147
PMCPMC12444270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.