ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Navigating the bench to bedside maze: Lessons from CTSA hubs on streamlining research support in academic medical centers.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) offer a range of resources to support clinical and translational research and science. However, research professionals often face challenges in navigating these resources effectively. Objective: Our study sought to examine research navigation services across CTSA hubs to identify successful strategies, common challenges, and best practices for supporting research teams. Methods: We conducted interviews with representatives from ten CTSA hubs and performed a landscape analysis to explore the types of research navigation services available, the methods of advertising and orienting faculty and staff, and the challenges faced in launching and maintaining these services. Results: Our analysis identified three primary types of research navigation services offered at CTSA hubs: online resource libraries, personalized research navigation with dedicated staff, and interdisciplinary research "studios" for protocol development. Despite these offerings, challenges such as low awareness, difficulties coordinating across siloed university systems, and limited metrics for evaluating navigation services persist. Conclusion: Effective research navigation requires a combination of web-based applications and in-person support, backed by institutional commitment to foster engagement and streamline access. Key strategies for successful navigation services include proactive advertising, integration with orientation programs, and cross-departmental collaboration. Our findings offer actionable recommendations for enhancing research navigation at AMCs, ultimately aiming to increase research productivity and collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.