ArticleNMC case report journal2025
Thrombectomy for Posterior Communicating Artery Occlusion: Report of an Extremely Rare Case, Review, and Technical Nuance.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occlusion of the posterior communicating artery in isolation, without tandem lesions, is extremely rare. To our knowledge, only one prior report has described mechanical thrombectomy on a pure posterior communicating artery occlusion. This report describes the diagnostic and technical nuances involved in treating such an occlusion via mechanical thrombectomy. A 70-year-old male was admitted to our emergency department with left-sided hemiparesis. A computed tomography scan excluded intracranial hemorrhage. Follow-up computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging were performed. The right P1 segment cannot be appreciated on computed tomography angiography, suggesting occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy with a combined stent-aspiration technique achieved thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 3 in one pass. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged to a rehabilitation hospital with a modified Rankin Scale score of 2. Posterior communicating artery occlusion is extremely rare, with only one documented report to date. The pressure difference between the internal carotid artery and the posterior cerebral artery across the posterior communicating artery is considerably low; thus, the likelihood of a thrombus passing from either side through the posterior communicating artery is low. In our case, the right posterior communicating artery fetal type with a normal posterior cerebral artery, where the right posterior cerebral artery is naturally hypoplastic, while the contralateral posterior cerebral artery was normal in size, thus misleading us into assuming the occlusion was in the P1 segment. We used a stent-retrieving into an aspiration catheter technique, which proved feasible and resulted in complete recanalization. Mechanical thrombectomy with the combined aspiration-stent retriever technique is feasible and safe for treating posterior communicating artery occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.