ArticleCureus2025
A Rare Cause of an Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Young Pregnant Woman After Misoprostol-Induced Abortion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), myocardial infarction (MI), and sudden cardiac death, particularly in younger individuals without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD) is a specific subset of SCAD that accounts for a significant number of MIs in pregnant and postpartum women. Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue that is used for medical termination of pregnancy and has been associated with coronary vasospasm in rare cases; however, our case highlights a potential new association between this drug and SCAD. A 29-year-old African American woman with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency room with seizure-like activity and unresponsiveness witnessed by her sister while they were traveling on a road trip few hours after taking Misoprostol for termination of an ectopic pregnancy. Coronary angiography showed focal 95% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery with TIMI 1 flow concerning spontaneous coronary artery dissection versus coronary vasospasm. A decision was made to proceed with percutaneous coronary intervention to the LAD. The procedure was complicated by no reflow and retrograde advancement of dissection/hematoma to the left main coronary artery, requiring further stenting with overlapping stents from the ostial left main coronary artery to the proximal LAD artery. During the procedure, the patient developed multiple cardiac arrests with pulseless electrical activity requiring advanced cardiac life support, pressors, and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement for mechanical circulatory support. She subsequently showed marked improvement and was successfully weaned off vasopressors, and the LVAD was removed by day 4 in the ICU. On day 8, the patient was successfully extubated. The follow-up 2D echocardiogram showed improvement in the ejection fraction to 40-45%. The patient was safely discharged and made significant cardiovascular recovery. This is an interesting case discussion highlighting a rare and potential association between a commonly prescribed medication and a serious cardiovascular complication. It has been observed that SCAD occurs with higher frequency during pregnancy, peripartum period, and with the use of exogenous hormones although the exact etiology remains unclear. More research should be done to better understand the potential cardiovascular adverse effects of Misoprostol, especially on patients with underlying SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.