ReviewCureus2025
Deciphering the Research Environment of Dengue Epidemiology: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This bibliometric analysis presents a comprehensive evaluation of the contemporary medical literature concerning dengue epidemiology, with a particular emphasis on its global impact in the 21st century. Utilizing an informetric approach, the study offers a systematic overview of the research landscape, identifying trends and driving factors influencing scholarly output in this domain. A dataset comprising 2,982 peer-reviewed publications from the past decade was curated from the Web of Science Core Collection, using the keyword "Dengue Epidemiology" to ensure thematic relevance. Subsequent analysis was conducted using VOSviewer version 1.6.20 software to generate visual mappings based on variables including country of origin, keyword co-occurrence, affiliated academic institutions, and publication venues. The dominance of research output from non-endemic regions suggests a shift in global interest, potentially reflective of the expanding geographic distribution of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.