ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Multiple Acquired Smooth Muscle Hamartoma With Depressed Appearance.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smooth muscle hamartoma (SMH) is a benign cutaneous tumor that typically presents at birth as a solitary lesion in the lumbosacral region. Acquired cases with multiple lesions and subtle depression are exceedingly rare. We report a 40-year-old male with a seven-year history of multiple pigmented macules with slight depression on the trunk and extremities. Histopathology of a back lesion revealed irregularly distributed bundles of pale eosinophilic smooth muscle fibers in the upper dermis, positive for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). Basal hyperpigmentation was observed, without swelling of collagen fibers or atrophic eccrine glands. Differential diagnoses such as Becker's nevus and atrophoderma of Pasini and Pierini were excluded based on clinical and histological findings. Taken together, the patient was diagnosed with SMH. Although excision may be considered for solitary lesions, it was not performed in our patient due to multiple lesions. No progression was observed over two years of follow-up. This case illustrates a unique acquired SMH with multiple lesions and depressed appearance, emphasizing the importance of recognizing this entity in the differential diagnosis of multiple pigmented macules in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.