ReviewCureus2025
Use of the STONE Score for Predicting the Outcomes of Lithotripsy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary stone disease is a common urological condition that affects individuals across all age groups worldwide. It is traditionally more common in developed countries, but the incidence is rising in the tropics. This increase is possibly linked to climate change, increased ambient temperatures, and the adoption of westernized diets. Its occurrence is approximately twice as high in males as in females. Several systems have been formulated to help predict complications and other outcomes of lithotripsy. Examples include the STONE (Size, Topography, Obstruction, Number, Evaluation) scoring system, Clinical Research of the Endourological Society nomogram, Guy's scoring system, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity. The STONE scoring system is a simple tool derived from CT findings of patients with upper urinary tract stones. It was initially designed to predict the stone-free rate in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, it was later modified for use in ureteroscopy. Multiple studies have been published that show that the score has a reasonable predictive accuracy in determining the outcomes of lithotripsy. It is comparable to the other nephrolithometric scoring systems and can serve as a useful tool in perioperative patient management. This review aims to examine the STONE scoring system, its correlation with clinical outcomes, and comparison with alternative scoring systems, ultimately assessing its importance in the management of patients with upper urinary tract stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.