ArticleCureus2025
Primary Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis Presenting as a Benign Scrotal Mass: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis: A case report.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Primary malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis presenting as hydrocele: imaging pitfalls.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis is an exceptionally uncommon neoplasm, comprising a very small fraction of all mesothelioma cases. Due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, it is frequently misdiagnosed as benign scrotal conditions, such as a hydrocele. In our case, a 77-year-old male presented with a gradually enlarging swelling in the left hemiscrotum. Scrotal Doppler ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a hydrocele with polypoid masses and nodular soft tissue components of the tunica vaginalis. Tumor markers were normal. Surgical exploration revealed multiple solid masses on the testis and spermatic cord. Histopathologic examination confirmed malignant mesothelioma of epithelioid type, supported by immunohistochemical reactivity for calretinin, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), pan-cytokeratin (PanCK), Wilms tumor 1 (WT1), and loss of BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1). Following the diagnosis of primary tunica vaginalis mesothelioma, the patient underwent radical inguinal orchiectomy and hemiscrotectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin was administered. No recurrence was detected after seven cycles, and the patient remains disease-free. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of tunica vaginalis mesothelioma because of its infrequency and clinical similarity with benign processes. Diagnosis needs to be based on multimodal imaging, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry. Early and total surgical intervention followed by adjuvant therapy may hold the key to successful treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.