ArticleCureus2025
Sustained Successful Treatment of Two Phenotypically Different Cases of Genital Papular Acantholytic Dyskeratosis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genital papular acantholytic dyskeratosis (GPAD) is a rare, recurrent condition. It is characterised by skin coloured or whitish papules which may coalesce to form plaques affecting the genitocrural or anogenital skin in women and men. Histological features include hyperkeratosis, focal parakeratosis with acantholytic and dyskeratotic cells. It is recognised as a distinct clinicopathological entity localised to genital skin, but there are increasing suggestions of genetic links with Hailey-Hailey disease and Darier's disease. Heat, friction, and hormonal influence may play a role in aetiology. We present two patients with different phenotypical presentations who have had effective treatment sustaining remission. Corticosteroids are widely reported as an ineffective treatment, but our first patient had a rapid response to oral prednisolone without recurrence. The second case supports the evidence that surgical excision is an effective option for localised disease. Both patients presented via circuitous routes. Diagnosis is often delayed and likely underestimated. Our first patient developed the condition after surgical menopause, which may add to evidence of hormonal influence. We highlight that GPAD is an important differential to consider for vulval, anogenital, or genitocrural papules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.