ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Evaluation and Compliance With Guidelines in Surgical Patients: A Clinical Audit at the Prince Osman Digna Referral Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Caprini score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment: A scoping review of applications, validation, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Dynamic Evolution Characteristics and Nursing Intervention Windows of Perioperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Lower Extremity Traumatic Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of avoidable hospital-acquired morbidity and mortality. Despite clear international guidelines from bodies such as the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), compliance in surgical settings remains suboptimal. This clinical audit aimed to evaluate and improve the documentation and implementation of VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis among surgical patients. Methods A closed-loop clinical audit was conducted at Prince Osman Digna Referral Hospital, Port Sudan, Sudan. The study included retrospective and prospective data collection across two audit cycles, the first involving 50, and the second cycle, 47 randomly selected surgical inpatient records. Data were gathered using a standardized tool aligned with international guidelines. Interventions between the cycles included educational workshops, implementation of standardized assessment forms, visual aids, and feedback sessions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test to determine changes in compliance. Results In the first cycle (N = 50), compliance was poor: zero (0%) had Caprini scores documented, and 49 (98%) received no prophylaxis. Following targeted interventions, the second cycle (N = 47) showed significant improvement. Caprini score documentation increased to 39 (83%), early mobilization to 30 (63.8%), and LMWH administration to nine (19.1%). Use of TED stockings rose to eight (17%), while those receiving no prophylaxis dropped to seven (14.9%). Documentation of prophylaxis duration improved to 37 (78.7%), compared to one (2%) in the first cycle. Guideline-consistent management plans increased from one (2%) to 30 (65.2%), and education on VTE risk and prophylaxis rose from one (2%) to 20 (42.6%). All improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Targeted interventions led to substantial improvements in VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis practices. Standardized tools, clinician education, and systematic feedback proved effective in promoting adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Sustained efforts are essential to maintain compliance and enhance patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.