ArticleCureus2025
Variability in Self-Reported Preoperative Pain Between Clinic Visits and Day of Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative pain is routinely reported in the clinical literature and is benchmarked against numerous clinical parameters, necessitating that baseline preoperative pain is precisely defined and exhibits minimal variability. The goal of this study was to determine whether there is variability in pain scores obtained on the day of surgery (DOS) compared to preoperative clinic visits. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and spinal fusion (SF). Self-reported 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores were compared between clinic visits and DOS in 1,567 patients. The primary intent was to determine if there were differences between clinical and DOS NRS scores. Secondary analyses were performed by stratifying the results by procedure, gender, and time of clinic visit. Additionally, we performed a qualitative literature review to assess how the timing of preoperative pain assessments is reported.
resultsOur primary analysis found patients undergoing painful procedures reported significantly greater pain in the clinic compared to DOS, with a median difference of 3 and an interquartile range (IQR) of 6 (p < 0.0001). For our secondary analyses, similar differences between clinic and DOS were found for TKA (3; IQR 7; p < 0.0001), THA (3; IQR 7; p < 0.0001), and SF (2; IQR 5; p < 0.0001). Stratification by gender revealed comparable reductions (p = 0.6985). Finally, these discrepancies were consistent across preoperative clinic visits ranging from 1-90 days prior to surgery compared to DOS (p = 0.1944). Our qualitative literature review revealed that the timing of preoperative pain acquisition is rarely reported.
conclusionsOur results indicate that the degree of patient-reported pain differs drastically between clinic visits and DOS and identify a potential source of interstudy variability, highlighting the importance of defining the timing and setting of preoperative pain assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.