Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978848›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Variability in Self-Reported Preoperative Pain Between Clinic Visits and Day of Surgery.

David E Komatsu, Sunitha M Singh, Susannah Oster, James Espeleta, Maheen Khan, Harry Divaris, Sarah Landman, Samuel Stanley, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Martin Kaczocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David E KomatsuOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Sunitha M SinghAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Susannah OsterAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
James EspeletaAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Maheen KhanAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Harry DivarisOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Sarah LandmanAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Samuel StanleyAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Elliott Bennett-GuerreroAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Martin KaczochaAnesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.

Funding

Endocannabinoid Metabolism in Acute PainR01DA048002 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KACZOCHA, MARTIN · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative pain is routinely reported in the clinical literature and is benchmarked against numerous clinical parameters, necessitating that baseline preoperative pain is precisely defined and exhibits minimal variability. The goal of this study was to determine whether there is variability in pain scores obtained on the day of surgery (DOS) compared to preoperative clinic visits.  Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and spinal fusion (SF). Self-reported 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores were compared between clinic visits and DOS in 1,567 patients. The primary intent was to determine if there were differences between clinical and DOS NRS scores. Secondary analyses were performed by stratifying the results by procedure, gender, and time of clinic visit. Additionally, we performed a qualitative literature review to assess how the timing of preoperative pain assessments is reported.

resultsOur primary analysis found patients undergoing painful procedures reported significantly greater pain in the clinic compared to DOS, with a median difference of 3 and an interquartile range (IQR) of 6 (p < 0.0001). For our secondary analyses, similar differences between clinic and DOS were found for TKA (3; IQR 7; p < 0.0001), THA (3; IQR 7; p < 0.0001), and SF (2; IQR 5; p < 0.0001). Stratification by gender revealed comparable reductions (p = 0.6985). Finally, these discrepancies were consistent across preoperative clinic visits ranging from 1-90 days prior to surgery compared to DOS (p = 0.1944). Our qualitative literature review revealed that the timing of preoperative pain acquisition is rarely reported.

conclusionsOur results indicate that the degree of patient-reported pain differs drastically between clinic visits and DOS and identify a potential source of interstudy variability, highlighting the importance of defining the timing and setting of preoperative pain assessments.

Indexed as

numerical rating scalepainpreoperativespinal fusiontotal hip arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40978848
PMCPMC12448139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.