ArticleCureus2025
Exploration of Intersections and Divergences of Long COVID and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hypothesis connecting dysgeusia due to defects in ATP-P2X3 signaling and fatigue in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: lessons learned from long-COVID.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Reply to the letter "Long-COVID may not be explained by skeletal muscle involvement, but rather by other, more compelling pathophysiological concepts".Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFatigue is the most common symptom of Long COVID (LC), defined by persistent or newly emerging symptoms that develop at least three months after an initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, in the absence of other identifiable cause. This study investigates the prevalence of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) as a potential comorbidity of LC.
methodsThe study enrolled 37 adult controls with no documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and 32 individuals with a history of infection, categorized as LC-yes (with LC symptoms) and LC-no (without LC symptoms). ME/CFS diagnosis was based on the International Consensus Criteria (ICC).
resultsAmong LC-yes cases, the most frequently reported symptoms included post-exertional malaise (PEM); neurosensory, perceptual, or motor disturbances; cognitive impairment; sleep disturbances; pain; impaired thermoregulation; and flu-like symptoms, all occurring significantly more than in the LC-no or control groups. All individuals in the LC-yes group reported PEM. ME/CFS was diagnosed in three LC-yes cases (18.8%), one LC-no case (6.7%), and four control subjects (10.8%), with no statistically significant differences observed among groups. Experiencing more than six symptoms during acute infection, such as fatigue, loss of taste or smell, headache, fever, cough, myalgia, sore throat, shortness of breath, rhinorrhea, and diarrhea, was associated with a twofold higher risk of developing LC.
conclusionA substantial proportion of LC-yes individuals experienced PEM; neurosensory, perceptual, or motor disturbances; cognitive impairment; and sleep disturbances, with rates significantly exceeding those in the LC-no and control groups. Nevertheless, only a minority of LC-yes cases (18.8%) satisfied criteria for the ME/CFS, and the prevalence did not significantly differ from LC-no and controls. These findings suggest that while many symptoms of LC overlap with those of ME/CFS, only a subset of LC cases meet established ME/CFS diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.