ReviewCureus2025
Benign Early Repolarization Phenomenon in Young Adults and Athletes: A Literature Review of Clinical Insights and Diagnostic Considerations.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early repolarization (ER) is an electrocardiographic pattern characterized by J-point elevation and ST-segment changes, historically considered a benign finding, especially in young adults and athletes. This review explores the clinical relevance of ER, emphasizing its electrophysiological basis, demographic patterns, and implications for risk stratification. While ER frequently appears in healthy individuals, particularly those engaged in high-intensity training, certain morphological variants and dynamic patterns have been associated with an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The prevalence of ER is notably higher in athletes, reflecting physiological adaptations to sustained physical activity rather than underlying pathology. However, in middle-aged individuals or those with a personal or family history of arrhythmias, time-varying ER may suggest a more arrhythmogenic substrate requiring closer surveillance. Electrocardiographic features such as horizontal ST segments, fragmented QRS complexes, or widespread J-point elevation may indicate a higher risk. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation includes history-taking, physical examination, Holter monitoring, exercise testing, and, when indicated, advanced imaging or electrophysiological studies. Management strategies emphasize contextual interpretation, shared decision-making, and personalized follow-up, particularly in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.