Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978819›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Benign Early Repolarization Phenomenon in Young Adults and Athletes: A Literature Review of Clinical Insights and Diagnostic Considerations.

Alberto Rojas Peláez, Enmanuel Sevilla Torres, Daniela Fernandez Vinocour, Freddy Lizano Guevara, David Sáenz Araya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto Rojas PeláezGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas (UCIMED), San José, CRI.
Enmanuel Sevilla TorresGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas (UCIMED), San José, CRI.
Daniela Fernandez VinocourGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas (UCIMED), San José, CRI.
Freddy Lizano GuevaraGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas (UCIMED), San José, CRI.
David Sáenz ArayaGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas (UCIMED), San José, CRI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early repolarization (ER) is an electrocardiographic pattern characterized by J-point elevation and ST-segment changes, historically considered a benign finding, especially in young adults and athletes. This review explores the clinical relevance of ER, emphasizing its electrophysiological basis, demographic patterns, and implications for risk stratification. While ER frequently appears in healthy individuals, particularly those engaged in high-intensity training, certain morphological variants and dynamic patterns have been associated with an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The prevalence of ER is notably higher in athletes, reflecting physiological adaptations to sustained physical activity rather than underlying pathology. However, in middle-aged individuals or those with a personal or family history of arrhythmias, time-varying ER may suggest a more arrhythmogenic substrate requiring closer surveillance. Electrocardiographic features such as horizontal ST segments, fragmented QRS complexes, or widespread J-point elevation may indicate a higher risk. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation includes history-taking, physical examination, Holter monitoring, exercise testing, and, when indicated, advanced imaging or electrophysiological studies. Management strategies emphasize contextual interpretation, shared decision-making, and personalized follow-up, particularly in athletes.

Indexed as

holter monitoringj-point elevationrisk stratificationst-segment morphologysudden cardiac deathventricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID40978819
PMCPMC12448046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.