Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978801›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

A review and case study of

Sijia Liu, Peng Zhuang, Zipeng Cai, Yuqing Bai, Jingen Peng, Zaid Khan, Luwen Zhang, Rongsheng Li, Jinchang Yang, Hongyue Cai and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sijia Liu *College of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Peng Zhuang *College of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Zipeng CaiCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Yuqing BaiAdministrative Office of Wutong Mountain National Park, Shenzhen, China.
Jingen PengCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Zaid KhanCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Luwen ZhangCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Rongsheng LiForest Resources Research Center, Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Jinchang YangForest Resources Research Center, Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyue CaiCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Lijuan XieCollege of Architectural Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpine rhododendrons have high ecological, ornamental, and recreational value due to its colourful flowers and tall trees, and making it a promising candidate for urban gardens. However, its long growth cycle and lack of adaptation to low altitude environments often result in leaf burning and weak plant growth, hindering its widespread use in urban gardens. Moreover, the existing literature often fails to present key information on propagation techniques and low altitude acclimatisation of alpine rhododendrons in a clear and concise manner. To tackle this issue, we used the example of the alpine evergreen azalea,

Indexed as

breeding and cultivationclimate changemycorrhizal fungiRhododendron moulmainensestress response

Identifiers

PMID40978801
PMCPMC12446358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.