ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Uncovering dormancy stage predictors in sweet cherry through DNA methylation and machine learning integration.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: DNA methylation data sets from three different experiments underwent classification using Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), complemented by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. The importance of the features was evaluated using the Integrated Model consensus in the RF, XGBoost, and SHAP metrics. Results: The selection of features significantly improved the classification performance in the three-stages models (paradormancy, endodormancy, ecodormancy) and two-stages (endodormancy and ecodormancy). RF constantly exceeded XGBoost, achieving an accuracy of up to 97.1% in the two-stages scenario using informative cytosine level data. The SHAP analyses demonstrated that the selected feature effectively discriminated among stages of dormancy and revealed biologically significant epigenetic features. The key features were distributed not random throughout the genome, often colocalizing with transposable elements of long terminal repetition (LTR), particularly LTR/ty3-retrotransposons and LTR/copia families. Some features also co-localize with QTLs for chilling and heat requirement, flowering time and maturity date previously identified. Conclusions: This study highlights the usefulness of combining high-resolution methylation data with interpretable ML techniques to identify robust dormancy biomarkers. The enrichment of the features associated with dormancy within the transposable elements and the proximal regions of genes suggests an epigenetic regulation through the remodeling of chromatin mediated by TE. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of dormancy mechanisms and offer a basis for the development of non-destructive tools based on methylation to improve phenological management in perennial fruit crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.