ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Long-term management of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: comparison of patients over and under 75 years old.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tocilizumab in German patients with RA: real-world evidence from the noninterventional studies ARATA and ICHIBAN.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few real-life long-term data depending on patient age are available in patients starting tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: This study aimed to compare patient characteristics and long-term management with TCZ in RA patients over and under 75 years of age. Methods: This real-world study was based on secondary data from the French National administrative Healthcare database (SNDS). Eligible adult patients were diagnosed with a RA, and had a first TCZ delivery between 2015/01/01 and 2016/12/31 (index date). Patient data were extracted for the 4 years prior to the index date, and until 2019/12/31. All data were described according to patient age at the index date (<75 and ≥75 years). Therapeutic lines were described from the index date. Maintenance of TCZ therapy was analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Adverse events were described using adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR; reference: age <75 years). Results: Among the 4,290 analyzed patients (mean age: 57 ± 14 years; female: 77.4%), 3,888 (90.6%) were aged <75 years and 402 (9.4%) were older. Most patients were treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for more than 1 year prior to TCZ initiation (<75 years: 83.6%, ≥75 years: 69.9%). At the index date, 48.5% of elderly received SC TCZ (<75 years: 58.1%), 66.2% had TCZ monotherapy (vs. 51.2%), and 83.3% corticosteroids (vs. 76.1%). The median time of TCZ maintenance was similar in both groups [ <75 years: 17.9 months, 95% CI (16.6-19.5); ≥75 years: 14.9 months (11.6-18.6)]. Over follow-up, patients aged at least 75 years experienced more severe and opportunistic infections than younger patients [17.7 vs. 6.9 events per 100 patient-year, aHR: 1.80; 95% CI (1.53-2.13)], acute cardiovascular events [5.6 vs. 1.4; 2.13 (1.60-2.83)], hematological complications [2.0 vs. ≤ 1.0; 1.88 (1.22-2.91)], and deaths [4.7 vs. ≤ 1.0; 3.71 (2.64-5.21)], but no differences were observed for hepatitis, cancer, allergic reaction, and digestive perforation. Conclusion: This large French nationwide study conducted in patients who initiated TCZ for RA provide reassuring results for patients aged at least 75 years compared to younger patients, in particular regarding treatment maintenance. No new safety signals were identified in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.